From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA15164; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:17 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA16105 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (mx1.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.5]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i779FFmL013128 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:15 +0200 Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2A7135; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:14 +0200 (MST) Received: from mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48786-02; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:14 +0200 (MST) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sams.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.50]) by mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2595E128; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:08 +0200 (MST) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (localhost.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [127.0.0.1]) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i779F7jK082699; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:15:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sperber@sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i779EvdO082695; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:14:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sperber) To: "Brandon J. Van Every" Cc: "caml" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XEmacs or GNU Emacs? References: From: Michael Sperber Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 11:14:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brandon J. Van Every's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:35:54 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41149DA3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sperber:01 sperber:01 brandon:99 brandon:99 blabla:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 writes:01 emacs:01 emacs:01 o'caml:02 coding:03 gnu:05 gnu:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Brandon" == Brandon J Van Every writes: Brandon> Does either XEmacs or GNU Emacs have any particular advantage to an Brandon> OCaml developer on Windows 2000? I'm becoming aware that there's a lot Brandon> of politics about them, but hopefully people around here are Brandon> disinterested and only concerned with what makes OCaml coding easier. A slight advantage might be that the XEmacs package collection comes with the O'Caml mode. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners