caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Stodghill <stodghil@cs.cornell.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Duplicate methods - bug or feature?
Date: 23 Aug 2001 12:31:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yz1elq291q9.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010823182458.G1841@alan-schm1p> (Alan Schmitt's message of "Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:24:58 +0200")

While I understand how this is handy in the case of multiple
inheritance, I don't see how this is useful when both methods are in the
same class. I think that if duplicates methods appear in a class, then
it is very likely to be an error. At a minimum, a warning should be
issues that the first method will be ignored.

I bring this up, because I just tracked down a bug in some of my own
code that resulted from two methods with the same name existing in the
same class. It was a "cut and paste" error on my part.

Thanks.


> You might consider it a feature, due to multiple inheritance. IIRC, when
> a class inherits from two classes which define the same method name, the
> last one wins.
> 
> Alan Schmitt
> 
> * Paul Stodghill (stodghil@cs.cornell.edu) wrote:
> > Is it a bug or feature that a class can contain two methods with the
> > same name? Thanks.
> > 
> > milhouse$ uname -a
> > CYGWIN_NT-5.0 MILHOUSE 1.3.2(0.39/3/2) 2001-05-20 23:28 i686 unknown
> > milhouse$ ocamlc -v
> > The Objective Caml compiler, version 3.02
> > Standard library directory: /usr/local/lib/ocaml
> > milhouse$ 
> > milhouse$ 
> > milhouse$ cat double_method.ml 
> > class a =
> > object
> >   method m = "a.m1"
> >   method m = "a.m2"
> > end
> > ;;
> > 
> > let _ =
> >   let x = new a in
> >     Printf.printf "x=%s\n" x#m;
> >     ()
> > ;;
> > 
> > milhouse$ 
> > milhouse$ 
> > milhouse$ ocamlc -o double_method.exe double_method.ml 
> > milhouse$ ./double_method.exe 
> > x=a.m2
> > milhouse$ 
> > 
> > -------------------
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> 
> 
> --
> The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.

-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


      reply	other threads:[~2001-08-23 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-23 16:14 Paul Stodghill
2001-08-23 16:24 ` Alan Schmitt
2001-08-23 16:31   ` Paul Stodghill [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yz1elq291q9.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu \
    --to=stodghil@cs.cornell.edu \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).