categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mamuka Jibladze" <jib@rmi.acnet.ge>
To: <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: cracks and pots
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:22:48 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002301c64ac9$bdc5b310$4610a8c0@sanet.ge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FKRf8-00036i-Ep@mailserv.mta.ca>

> Category theory, and for that matter modern (as opposed to elementary)
> algebra, is to mathematics as mathematics is to physics, and for that
> matter to computer science.  Whereas mathematics organizes reasoning
> about the phenomena studied by physicists and computer scientists,
> algebra and category theory perform a similar function for mathematics.
>
> In any setting organization is desirable, and arguably necessary on
> occasion.  But the use of algebra and category theory to organize
> physics and computer science is a double whammy here.  One should
> therefore be doubly sympathetic of those physicists and computer
> scientists who want to know what substantive contribution is being made
> to their subject and can't evaluate the answers because they are one if
> not two levels removed from the necessary abstractions.
>
> Vaughan Pratt

It just occurred to me that to justify such viewpoint we might have to look
at the point in time when mathematics began to become abstracted out from
natural sciences to see whether category theory is already in the same
position with respect to the rest of mathematics.

Although I certainly do not know enough history of science, I will still
dare to speculate that the situation now is completely different from what
it was then. I believe mathematics as a substantial part of the body of
scientific knowledge did exist and evolve long long before it began to be
considered as some separate entity which can be used to organize the rest -
in fact many people still think of mathematics as just another science on
completely equal footing with, say, biology or physics.

Whereas birth and development of category theory has been, I think, much
more deliberate, abrupt and discontinuous in comparison. If this is so, one
possible conclusion might be that probably category theorists simply want
too much too soon. Maybe they should be more patient and let their
discipline become stronger within the body of mathematics before forcibly
declaring it a new organizing force outside the rest of mathematics. This is
as if a child would be forced to care for its parents shortly after being
born.

Mamuka Jibladze






  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-18 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-17  1:52 Vaughan Pratt
2006-03-18 15:21 ` James Stasheff
2006-03-18 20:22 ` Mamuka Jibladze [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-29 19:23 dusko
2006-03-29 14:02 David Yetter
2006-03-28  8:01 dusko
2006-03-29 12:57 ` Alex Simpson
2006-03-26 13:37 V. Schmitt
2006-03-25  3:22 David Yetter
2006-03-24 16:24 Marta Bunge
2006-03-23 19:45 Peter Arndt
2006-03-23 16:50 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-26 13:25 ` Urs Schreiber
2006-03-19 18:25 Steve Vickers
2006-03-18 15:19 James Stasheff
2006-03-17 18:29 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-17 17:26 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-17 16:24 Krzysztof Worytkiewicz
2006-03-17 14:25 jim stasheff
2006-03-17  9:36 George Janelidze
2006-03-17  8:49 Marta Bunge
2006-03-17  8:06 Marta Bunge
2006-03-16 20:47 John Baez
2006-03-16 18:41 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-16 17:29 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-16 14:54 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-16 12:05 dusko
2006-03-16  9:51 V. Schmitt
2006-03-15 21:00 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-15 13:35 RFC Walters
2006-03-14 19:56 John Baez
2006-03-15 12:23 ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-15 17:26 ` Krzysztof Worytkiewicz
     [not found] <BAY114-F26C035E683A780D5555217DFE10@phx.gbl>
2006-03-14 17:08 ` Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-14 17:48   ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-27 14:28     ` Peter Selinger
2006-03-12 22:29 Marta Bunge
2006-03-14  6:08 ` David Yetter
2006-03-14 23:18   ` Robert Seely
2006-03-14 14:55 ` Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-14 16:05 ` Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-14 16:30   ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-14 23:26     ` Dominic Hughes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002301c64ac9$bdc5b310$4610a8c0@sanet.ge' \
    --to=jib@rmi.acnet.ge \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).