From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2368 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: wlawvere@buffalo.edu Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re:first isomorphism theorem Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:43:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1056393816.3ef74a583a9e7@mail2.buffalo.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018608 3796 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:23:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:23:28 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Mon Jun 23 15:56:04 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:56:04 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19UWOH-0005LU-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:50:09 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 59 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2368 Archived-At: Toby Bartels pointed out >>the essence of the isomorphism theorem is that the forgetful functor to >>sets not only preserves limits but also preserves images and coimages >>even though it does not preserve coequalizers and cokernel pairs. In fact, as recent papers of Adamek,Lawvere,& Rosicky, and also of Pedicchio & Wood, have exploited, such forgetful functors do preserve all coequalizers of pairs which admit a reflexivity in the category; the preservation of images is a consequence.