From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/644 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Espinosa Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: CATS Are primes ever generators? Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 09:12:18 -0800 Message-ID: <199802131712.JAA10069@blackhawk.kestrel.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017092 26671 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 14:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: espinosa@kestrel.edu To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: cat-dist Fri Feb 13 17:06:38 1998 Original-Received: (from Majordom@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14900 for categories-list; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:41:33 -0400 (AST) X-Authentication-Warning: mailserv.mta.ca: Majordom set sender to cat-dist@mta.ca using -f Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk Original-Lines: 19 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:644 Archived-At: We can say that an object P in a category with coproducts is *prime* if whenever f : P -> A+B, f factors through one of the injections into A+B. (1) I didn't find any reference to this (obvious) notion of primality in the standard texts. Does it occur anywhere? (2) Is there any condition on the category under which the set of primes is a generating family? Since objects are decomposable into a "quotient of a coproduct of generators" (Borceux, volume 1, page 151), this would give a decomposition into primes. Thanks, David