From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/1166 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bill Halchin" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: co-exponential question Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:55:48 PDT Message-ID: <19990716195548.73188.qmail@hotmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017610 29783 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:06:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: cat-dist Mon Jul 19 13:07:55 1999 Original-Received: (from Majordom@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA09144 for categories-list; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 11:52:17 -0300 (ADT) X-Authentication-Warning: mailserv.mta.ca: Majordom set sender to cat-dist@mta.ca using -f X-Originating-IP: [131.107.3.74] Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk Original-Lines: 46 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:1166 Archived-At: This is actually a "dual" question. Basically I want to do the dual of the construction gives the notion of an exponential or map object. Suppose we have a category C with sums. Then we build the following category from C. object: T+X<-----Y map: from T+X<-----Y to T+X'<-------Y is a C map "alpha" such that we have the following diagram: I-sub-T+alpha T+X---------------------------->T+X' ^ ^ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \/ Y Then suppose there exists a C-object called Y**T such that T+Y**T<-------Y is the initial object of the category just built above. What significance does Y**T have opposed to the concept of an exponential???? If I did everything correctly it (Y**T) should be the dual of T**Y. Regards, Bill Halchin