categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David B. Benson"   <dbenson@eecs.wsu.edu>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: RFN (Request for Notation)
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 13:25:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200011262125.NAA22532@kamiak.eecs.wsu.edu> (raw)

Dear Colleagues,

I am preparing notes for a sophomore (second year)
course, and I am finding several places wherein
I can find no standard notation.  Your suggestions
will be most appreciated.

(1) Everybody knows that {(n,n+1) | n \in Z}
    is the <<successor>> relation.  What to call
    the corresponding idea when the underlying
    order is only a partial order?
      I am currently using <<followers>> as in
    phrases such as
    ``...the followers relation for the subsets
    of the finite set {a, b, c}...''
    in which ({a},{a,b}) is in the followers
    relation, but {{a},{a,b,c}) is not, anymore
    that (n,n+2) is in the successor relation.

      Is there a better word than <<followers>>?

(2) I need a snappy name for an order pair in
    a relation R.  The books I have seem to just
    say ``...the ordered pair (x,y) in relation R...''
    The problem is that there are many uses of
    ordered pairs, and this is a specific use,
    a description of the fact that 
       x is R-related to y
    by the fact that (x,y) \in R.
      The word ``association'' will not do as this
    has other meaning in computer science.  I am
    considered <<relator>> for an order pair in
    a relation, but have the impression that this
    word has been used for other purposes in the
    literature.

(3) I badly need a good name for the sets
        Nat_k = {n \in Nat | n < k }
    These are widely used and I am surprised that
    there is no satisfactory name in wide-spread use.
      These are NOT the sets Z_k = Z mod k,
    although the Nat_k form a system of distinct,
    canonical representatives for the Z_k.
      These are the set of array indices in computer
    languages such as C and SML.  In this use, the
    Nat_k have nothing whatsoever to do with Z_k
    and I certainly do not want to confuse the students!

Thank you in advance for any and all suggestions,
David
--
Professor David B. Benson                                (509) 335-2706
School of EE and Computer Science (EME 102A)             (509) 335-3818 fax
PO Box 642752, Washington State University               dbenson@eecs.wsu.edu
Pullman WA 99164-2752   U.S.A.



             reply	other threads:[~2000-11-26 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-26 21:25 David B. Benson [this message]
2000-11-27 16:39 ` Justin Pearson
     [not found] <200011271710.RAA07285@bruno.dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
2000-11-29 23:02 ` Paul Levy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200011262125.NAA22532@kamiak.eecs.wsu.edu \
    --to=dbenson@eecs.wsu.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).