From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2289 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Freyd Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: connected categories and epimorphisms. Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 14:19:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200305181819.h4IIJIgU022776@saul.cis.upenn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018552 3405 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:22:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:22:32 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Mon May 19 14:52:01 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:52:01 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19Hohy-0006b2-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:45:58 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 25 Original-Lines: 9 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2289 Archived-At: The quickest natural example I know of a connected category in which projections from products needn't be epi is the category of commutative rings. Well, actually, the opposite category. The coproduct of Z_2 and Z_3 is the terminal ring. The two co-projections fail to be monic (the coproduct of a pair of objects in this category is their tensor product).