From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2465 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Baez" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: quantum logic Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <200310120057.h9C0vK816608@math-cl-n01.ucr.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018678 4272 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:24:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:24:38 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca (categories) Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Sun Oct 12 14:05:32 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:05:32 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 1A8jcj-0000Ys-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:03:17 -0300 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 16 Original-Lines: 44 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2465 Archived-At: Dear Categorists - Do any of you know particularly insightful treatments of quantum logic via category theory? I'm more or less familiar with quantum logic as the theory of the complete orthocomplemented lattice of closed subspaces of a given Hilbert space. But now I'm interested in developing quantum logic starting as much as possible from general properties of and structures on the category of Hilbert spaces and bounded linear maps - for example, the fact that it's an abelian category, and becomes a *-category and symmetric monoidal category in a nice way (with Hilbert tensor product as the monoidal structure). And I'm interested in things like how the 2-dimensional Hilbert space acts a bit like a subobject classifier. I don't mind sticking with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces for now to avoid certain subtleties. On a related note: I've repeatedly heard people say something like "the multiplicative fragment of linear logic is the internal logic of (closed symmetric?) monoidal categories", but I've never heard a precise result along these lines. Has anyone worked out a sufficiently general concept of "the internal logic of a category" or "the internal logic of a certain 2-category of categories" so that one could take something like a monoidal category, or a symmetric monoidal category, or a closed symmetric monoidal category - or maybe the 2-category of all such - and extract by some systematic method the corresponding "internal logic"? I'm vaguely imagining some class of generalizations of the Mitchell-Benabou language of a topos, or something like that - but I'm really interested in the nonCartesian case. The reason I ask this is that it would be nice if you could throw the (closed, symmetric, monoidal, *, etcetera...) category of Hilbert spaces into some big machine and have "quantum logic" pop out - and then throw in other similar categories, and have other kinds of logic pop out. Best, jb