* re: question about lambda-filtered colimits
@ 2003-12-02 15:42 Jiri Rosicky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Rosicky @ 2003-12-02 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cat-dist
The proof can be found in the paper
J.Adamek, H.Herrlich, J.Rosicky, W.Tholen, On a generalized small-object
argument for the injective subcategory problem, Cah. Top. Geom. Diff.
Cat. XLIII (2002), 83-106.
----- Forwarded message from Gaucher Philippe <gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr> -----
>
>
> Dear category theorists
>
>
> I would be interested in knowing a proof of the following fact (due to J.
> Smith):
>
> "In a combinatorial model category M (i.e. a locally presentable cofibrantly
> generated model category), there are functorial factorizations of a map into
> a trivial cofibration followed by a fibration which preserve lambda-filtered
> colimits for sufficiently large regular cardinals lambda. The same is true
> for the factorizations as a cofibration followed by a trivial fibration."
>
> As far as I know about the proof, it suffices to apply the small object
> argument step-by-step and then to use some property of lambda-filtered
> colimits. The only property I know close to the problem is that a
> lambda-filtered colimits of lambda-presentable objects is lambda-presentable.
> But the underlying diagram of a pushout is not lambda-filtered. So I dont
> understand...
>
> Thanks in advance. pg.
>
>
>
>
----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* question about lambda-filtered colimits
@ 2003-12-01 12:45 Gaucher Philippe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gaucher Philippe @ 2003-12-01 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
Dear category theorists
I would be interested in knowing a proof of the following fact (due to J.
Smith):
"In a combinatorial model category M (i.e. a locally presentable cofibrantly
generated model category), there are functorial factorizations of a map into
a trivial cofibration followed by a fibration which preserve lambda-filtered
colimits for sufficiently large regular cardinals lambda. The same is true
for the factorizations as a cofibration followed by a trivial fibration."
As far as I know about the proof, it suffices to apply the small object
argument step-by-step and then to use some property of lambda-filtered
colimits. The only property I know close to the problem is that a
lambda-filtered colimits of lambda-presentable objects is lambda-presentable.
But the underlying diagram of a pushout is not lambda-filtered. So I dont
understand...
Thanks in advance. pg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-02 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-02 15:42 question about lambda-filtered colimits Jiri Rosicky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-01 12:45 Gaucher Philippe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).