From: David Yetter <dyetter@math.ksu.edu>
To: <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: mystification and categorification
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:55:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403051055.26794.dyetter@math.ksu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002a01c401ab$cd50b370$1767eb44@grassmann>
Categorification is a bit like quantization: it isn't a construction so much
as a desideratum for a relationship between one thing and another (in the
case of categorification an (n+1)-categorical structure and an n-categorical
structure; in the case of quantization a quantum mechanical system and
a classical mechanical system).
Categorification wants to find a higher-dimensional categorical structure
corresponding to a lower-dimensional one by weakening equations to
natural isomorphisms and imposing new, sensible, coherence conditions.
In general, for the original purpose for which it was proposed--constructions
of TQFT's and models of quantum gravity--one wants the highest categorical
level to have a linear structure (hence Baez wanting tensor product
and a sum it distributes over, rather than cartesian product and coproduct).
Specific lower-dimensional categories with structure are 'categorified' by
finding a higher-dimensional category with the new structure which 'lies over'
the lower dimensional one in the way an additive monoidal category lies
over its Grothendieck rig.
For instance any (k-linear) monoidal category with monoid of isomorphism
classes M is a categorification of M, and more generally (k-linear) monoidal
categories are a categorification of monoids.
A simple example shows why it is not a construction: commutative monoids
(as rather special categories with one object) admit two different
categorifications: symmetric monoidal categories and braided monoidal
categories (each regarded as a kind of bicategory with one object).
There is a good argument for regarding braided monoidal categories
as the 'correct' categorification: the Eckmann-Hilton theorem ('a group
in GROUPS is an abelian group' or, really as the proof shows, 'a monoid
in MONOIDS is a commutative monoid') 'categorifies' to: A monoidal category
in MONCAT is a braided monoidal category.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-05 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <schanuel@adelphia.net>
2004-03-04 5:44 ` Stephen Schanuel
2004-03-05 16:55 ` David Yetter [this message]
2004-03-06 6:49 ` Vaughan Pratt
2004-03-07 21:04 ` Mike Oliver
2004-03-08 10:20 ` Steve Vickers
2004-03-07 19:43 ` Tom Leinster
2004-03-09 10:54 ` Pawel Sobocinski
2004-03-12 13:50 ` Quillen model structure of category of toposes/locales? Vidhyanath Rao
2003-02-20 0:16 More Topos questions ala "Conceptual Mathematics" Galchin Vasili
2003-02-20 18:48 ` Stephen Schanuel
2003-02-21 0:57 ` Vaughan Pratt
2003-06-10 21:23 ` Galchin Vasili
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403051055.26794.dyetter@math.ksu.edu \
--to=dyetter@math.ksu.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).