From: Philippe Gaucher <gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: Re: Semigroups with many objects
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:30:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511260530.06987.gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr> (raw)
Le vendredi 25 Novembre 2005 04:56, duraid@octopus.com.au a écrit :
> > Is there an accepted terminology for semigroups with many objects, i.e.
> > gadgets that satisfy the all the axioms satisfied by categories excepting
> > those
> > which refer to identities ?
>
> Koslowski calls these "taxonomies", see e.g. "Monads and interpolads in
> bicategories" (TAC vol 3, no 8 (1997)).
>
> Duraid
Dear all,
I call a "small semigroup with many objects enriched over the model category
of compactly generated topological spaces" a "flow" in my work (these objects
are interesting for me only if they are enriched over very particular model
categories satisfying particular properties). The terminology comes from the
fact that I use them to study the time flow of a higher dimensional automaton
(up to directed homotopy).
For "taxonomy", I would be very curious to know the origin of the terminology.
What does it mean exactly ?
In the paper q-alg/9608025 "Flexible sheaves", Carlos Simpson calls a "(not
necessarily small) semigroup with many objects enriched over the category of
topological spaces" a continuous semicategory.
I had also seen the word "precategory" but I cannot remember where. Beware of
the fact that the word precategory is also used for categories *with
identities* such that the composition law is partially defined : that is the
fact that the codomain of F is equal to the domain of G is not sufficient for
GoF to exist. Once again, I cannot remember where I read this word. The only
thing I remember is that that was a computer-scientific work.
The word "non-unital category" is also used sometime in mathematical papers.
pg.
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-26 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-26 4:30 Philippe Gaucher [this message]
2005-11-30 15:51 ` Lutz Schroeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511260530.06987.gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr \
--to=gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).