From: Michael Abbott <Michael@rcp.co.uk>
To: "'wlawvere@ACSU.Buffalo.EDU'" <wlawvere@ACSU.Buffalo.EDU>,
"'CATEGORIES@mta.ca'" <CATEGORIES@mta.ca>
Subject: RE: incompleteness of ZF
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:49:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <217F6DFA440ED111ACDA00A0C906B006109ABC@arsenic.rcp.co.uk> (raw)
As a lurker who failed to either notice the date or understand any
detail of Paul's demonstration, I appreciate Lawvere's comments.
I do feel, though, that he is overstating the impact of Paul's little
jest. There were several immediate replies (to the effect, I think,
that F(lim X) is not lim F X), and no riposte from Paul. My own
reaction was: hmm, it'll be interesting if anything else comes out of
this.
I sympathise very much with Paul's "anti-ZF" stance; after all, hasn't
Lawvere set the basis for a non-set foundation of practical mathematics?
-----Original Message-----
From: cat-dist@mta.ca [mailto:cat-dist@mta.ca]On Behalf Of F W Lawvere
Sent: 06 April 1999 22:41
To: CATEGORIES@mta.ca
Subject: categories: Re: incompleteness of ZF
Using an old logician's trick (see eg Feferman on paths thru O, or even
Goedel's original papers) as an
April Fool joke
may be amusing to some within the closed gates of a British University,
but is irresponsible on the world network. Think of the hundreds of
lurkers (who hesitate to speak up so that misconceptions can
be discussed and clarified openly, but) who are now furthering the rumor
that mathematics has somehow been proved inconsistent.The waves of such
disinformation can last for years or even decades.
************************************************************************
*******
F. William Lawvere Mathematics Dept. SUNY
wlawvere@acsu.buffalo.edu 106 Diefendorf Hall
716-829-2144 ext. 117 Buffalo, N.Y. 14214, USA
************************************************************************
*******
next reply other threads:[~1999-04-08 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-08 7:49 Michael Abbott [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-04-03 15:12 Thomas Streicher
1999-04-06 21:41 ` F W Lawvere
1999-04-07 23:45 ` R.A.G. Seely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=217F6DFA440ED111ACDA00A0C906B006109ABC@arsenic.rcp.co.uk \
--to=michael@rcp.co.uk \
--cc=CATEGORIES@mta.ca \
--cc=wlawvere@ACSU.Buffalo.EDU \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).