From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/941 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.Porter" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Jim's query Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:44:43 +0000 Message-ID: <3655805B.38C188D2@bangor.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017356 28418 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:02:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:02:36 +0000 (UTC) To: "categories@mta.ca" Original-X-From: cat-dist Fri Nov 20 13:23:36 1998 Original-Received: (from Majordom@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00792 for categories-list; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 11:19:59 -0400 (AST) X-Authentication-Warning: mailserv.mta.ca: Majordom set sender to cat-dist@mta.ca using -f X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; I) Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk Original-Lines: 80 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:941 Archived-At: This is not really an adequate reply to Jim's query. The reason is that as I understand it, he is asking for a source that will explore the homotopy theory of the `globular' models of weak infty categories. My approach to the area is in some sense the dual. Starting with the various models for homotopy types or bits of them, try to see what is mirrored in the weak infty category theory by the homotopy structure. This is in some sense the converse to his query but may none-the-less be relevant. My intuition was, and still is, that the Kan condition on simplicial sets gives a composition/pasting up to coherent homotopy. Moreover the `filler' gives the justification for the composite. (Compare the filler structure of the nerve of a category with that in an arbitrary Kan complex.) Accepting that as a starting point, and the idea that the `category' of weak infinity categories should be a weak infinity category, Jean-Marc Cordier and I looked at `locally Kan' simplicially enriched categories (e.g. Trans AMS 349(1997)1-54). With that viewpoint, it becomes clear that the structure of an A_\infty category is needed to make things really `coherent', but that many of the constructions of `ordinary' category theory have A_\infty or homotopy coherent analogues in this setting, which thus serves as a test-bed' for the development of the more general theory. In part this relates to Michael Batanin's paper in the Cahiers where explicit consideration of A_\infty structure is given. That theory looks at the `global' structure to some extent, but simplicially enriched groupoids model all homotopy types, so a corollary of the simplicial to globular type of transition should be that one should be able to construct weak \infty categroies DIRECTLY from the algebra of a simplicially enriched groupoid. The obvious place to look for this is in the Moore complex which carries a hypercrossed complex structure in the sense of Pilar Carrasco and Antonio Cegarra. (This is related to the n-hypergroupoid structures of Jack Duskin.) Exploring the \infty category structure, potentially in their definition, is the aim of another line of research and in low dimensions, this has been attacked by Ali Mutlu and myself, (see very recent articles in TAC or Bangor's preprint list on the web). Getting nearer to Jim's query, any bridge between homotopy theory and higher dimensional category theory should I feel aim to be approachable by algebraic topologists and therefore should start with a recognisable model for homotopy types. Another approach that must be mentioned is that of Tamsamani and Simpson using multisimplicial objects. Presumably this also links in with the cat^n-groupoid approach pioneered some 14 years ago by Loday. This only handles n-types but can be extended to a model that has higher information but in those dimensions above n, the Whitehead products are trivial. (Has anyone looked at the Whitehead and Samelson products from a globular or weak \infty category viewpoint?) The question of simplicial rather than cubical theory is a difficult one. Marco Grandis made a good case for the cubical formulation the other day, and the use of Kan filler conditions in a cubical setting has been for a long time a speciality of Heiner Kamps (see the recent book by him and me!). That theory does not directly address the question of A_\infty category structures, but it does raise a question that deserves some attention. Suppose you want an analogue of a given theorem from homotopy theory but in another non-topological context and you can get a weak composition structure in your setting (typically given by fillers for boxes in a cubical `enrichment'). What fillers/composites do you need for your particular theorem (e.g.Dold's theorem on homotopy equivalence between cofibrations, or long Dold-Puppe type sequences)? This last question also raises that of the motivation for the generalisations. I am convinced these are useful, even important, but perhaps some debate on directions to explore and goals to seek out might help in providing a fuller answer to Jim's question. Tim. ************************************************************ Timothy Porter |tel direct: +44 1248 382492 School of Mathematics |mathematics office: 382475 University of Wales, Bangor | fax: 383663 Dean St. |World Wide Web Bangor |homepage http://www.bangor.ac.uk/~mas013/ Gwynedd LL57 1UT |Mathematics and Knots : exhibition United Kingdom |http://www.bangor.ac.uk/ma/CPM/