From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/3575 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gaucher Philippe Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Grothendieck construction Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:17:02 +0100 Message-ID: <37875.0996817418$1241019387@news.gmane.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019386 9318 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:36:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:36:26 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Tue Jan 16 10:17:26 2007 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline X-Keywords: X-UID: 68 Original-Lines: 13 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:3575 Archived-At: Dear All, Where does the Grothendieck construction come from ? What is the original reference ? Here is the construction. Take a functor H:I-->Cat (the category of small categories) The objects are the pairs (i,a) where a is an object of H(i). A morphism (i,a)-->(j,b) consists of a morphism f:i-->j of I and a morphism H(f)(a)-->b of H(j). pg.