From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2418 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ronnie Brown Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: module for a category Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:51:14 +0100 Message-ID: <3F44B232.1F47521C@bangor.ac.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018645 4076 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:24:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:24:05 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Thu Aug 21 17:52:16 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:52:16 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19pwOt-0003t6-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:51:19 -0300 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 10 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2418 Archived-At: The following has a treatment of modules over groupoids, and the treatment for categories is presumably similar. (with P.J. HIGGINS), ``Crossed complexes and chain complexes with operators'', {\em Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.} 107 (1990) 33-57. Ronnie Brown http://www.bangor.ac.uk/~mas010/ Paul B Levy wrote: > > Hi > > Is there a standard reference for the notion of "left module for a > category"? (or right module, or bimodule) > > Is there any reference in the setting of ordinary categories rather than > (or as well as) enriched categories or bicategories? > > Thanks > Paul --