From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2440 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Krzysztof Worytkiewicz Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: associated sheaf functor Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:12:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3F674462.6090401@bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018664 4178 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:24:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:24:24 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Tue Sep 16 17:05:48 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:05:48 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19zM0G-0007fE-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:00:48 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 8 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2440 Archived-At: Dear All, Is anybody aware of a variant of the "plus" construction giving the "associated separated presheaf" wrt to a Grothendieck topology which works on a basis as only piece of data (ie without generating the whole topology and then applying the classical plus functor)? Any hint welcome... Cheers Krzysztof