From: Marco Grandis <grandis@dima.unige.it>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: re: Small semirings
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:52:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41321.9766378917$1241019382@news.gmane.org> (raw)
This site lists a lot of algebraic structures and often gives
information on finite examples:
http://math.chapman.edu/cgi-bin/structures
-----
Thus, for commutative rings (with 1) you have:
http://math.chapman.edu/structuresold/files/
Commutative_rings_with_identity.pdf
where you can find that there are:
- 1 structure with 1 element (or 2, 3, 5, 6 elements)
- 4 structures with 4 elements.
-----
The case of semirings is not (yet?) much developed: just a few
results and trivial examples.
See:
http://math.chapman.edu/structuresold/files/
Semirings_with_identity_and_zero.pdf
http://math.chapman.edu/structuresold/files/Semirings_with_zero.pdf
-------
Commutative semirings are not in the list, I think.
Marco Grandis
On 3 Jan 2007, at 23:09, Andrej Bauer wrote:
> Dear categorists,
>
> I have no idea where to ask the following algebra question. Hoping
> that
> some of you are algebraists, I am asking it here.
>
> I am looking for examples of small (finite and with few elements,
> say up
> to 8) commutative semirings with unit, by which I mean an algebraic
> structure which has +, *, 0 and 1, both operations are commutative
> and *
> distributes over +. The initial such structure are the natural
> numbers.
>
> Here are the examples I know:
>
> 1) Modular arithmetic, i.e., (Z_n, +, *, 0, 1)
>
> 2) Distributive lattices with 0 and 1.
>
> 3) "Cut-off" semiring, in which we compute like with natural numbers,
> but if a value exceeds a given constant N, then we cut it off at N.
> For
> example, if N = 7 then we would have 3 + 3 = 6, 3 + 6 = 7, 4 * 4 = 7,
> etc. Do such semirings have a name?
>
> There must be a census of small commutative rings, or even semirings.
> Does anyone know?
>
> Andrej
>
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-04 16:52 Marco Grandis [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-05 0:25 Josh Nichols-Barrer
2007-01-04 21:26 Vaughan Pratt
2007-01-03 22:09 Andrej Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='41321.9766378917$1241019382@news.gmane.org' \
--to=grandis@dima.unige.it \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).