Strong monoidal functors and Day convolution

[Lorenzo Riva <lriva@nd.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]

Dear all,

Given a V-enriched category C and sufficiently many assumptions on V and C, there is an equivalence between (symmetric) lax monoidal functors C --> V and (commutative) monoids in Fun(C,V) with respect to Day convolution. I am interested in knowing if there is a similar characterization in the literature for strong monoidal functors, as a property of objects of Mon(Fun(C,V)) or possibly BiMon(Fun(C,V)). The latter contains functors with a monoid structure for Day convolution and a comonoid structure for Day coconvolution, obtained by taking a right Kan extension in place of the usual left Kan extension in the definition of Day convolution.

Best,
Lorenzo


You're receiving this message because you're a member of the Categories mailing list group from Macquarie University. To take part in this conversation, reply all to this message.

View group files<https://outlook.office365.com/owa/categories@mq.edu.au/groupsubscription.ashx?source=EscalatedMessage&action=files&GuestId=4eb9b40c-9b3a-48a5-9781-836e5a171e8b>   |   Leave group<https://outlook.office365.com/owa/categories@mq.edu.au/groupsubscription.ashx?source=EscalatedMessage&action=leave&GuestId=4eb9b40c-9b3a-48a5-9781-836e5a171e8b>   |   Learn more about Microsoft 365 Groups<https://aka.ms/o365g>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3238 bytes --]