From: wlawvere@buffalo.edu
To: Gaucher Philippe <Philippe.Gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr>
Subject: Re: Grothendieck construction
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:23:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43796.8899649151$1241019389@news.gmane.org> (raw)
Because Grothendieck made many constructions that
became iconic, the terminology is ambiguous.
I call this construction
"the Grothendieck semi-direct product"
because the formula for composition of these
morphisms is exactly the same as in the very special
case where I is a group.
Of course the result of the construction is a single
category "fibered" over I and every fibred category
so arises.
The original example for me (1959) was that from
Cartan-Eilenberg where I is a category of rings and
H(i) is the category of modules over i. Because
J. L. Kelley had proposed "galactic" as the analogue
at the Cat level of the traditional "local" at the level
of a space, I called such an H a "galactic cluster" .
The "fibration' terminology and the accompanying
results and definitions for descent etc were presented
by AG in Paris seminars in the very early 1960's and
can probably be accessed elecronically now.
Best wishes
Bill
Quoting Gaucher Philippe <Philippe.Gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr>:
> Dear All,
>
> Where does the Grothendieck construction come from? What is the
> original
> reference? Here is the construction.
>
> Take a functor H:I-->Cat (the category of small categories)
>
> The objects are the pairs (i,a) where a is an object of H(i).
> A morphism (i,a)-->(j,b) consists of a morphism f:i-->j of I and a
> morphism
> H(f)(a)-->b of H(j).
>
> pg.
>
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-17 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 1:23 wlawvere [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-13 21:40 Grothendieck Construction Joseph Moeller
2007-01-19 18:44 Grothendieck construction David Espinosa
2007-01-18 19:50 I. Moerdijk
2007-01-17 8:47 Artur Zawlocki
2007-01-16 14:17 Gaucher Philippe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='43796.8899649151$1241019389@news.gmane.org' \
--to=wlawvere@buffalo.edu \
--cc=Philippe.Gaucher@pps.jussieu.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).