From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/3286 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Baez" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: dualities Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4980.09504885903$1241019205@news.gmane.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019204 8074 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:33:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:33:24 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca (categories) Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Tue May 2 21:21:23 2006 -0300 X-Keywords: X-UID: 116 Original-Lines: 50 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:3286 Archived-At: Hi - > First, let me say I have avoided contributing to this thread because I > don't understand what Vaughan is asking. He asked if dualities categorify. I guess he meant something like this: There are lots of interesting examples of a pair of categories C,D together with an object c in C and an object d in D such that hom(-,c): C -> D and hom(-,d): D -> C are part of an equivalence of categories. In the nicest examples, c and d are in some sense the same mathematical entity regarded as living in two different categories - a "schizophrenic object", in the words of Harold Simmons. So, can we find equally nice examples where C and D are instead 2-categories? In particular, can we find examples where C and D are 2-categorical generalizations of the 1-categorical examples we already know? In particular, he suggested taking the example where C is the category of finite distributive lattices and finding an analogous example where C is the 2-category of (maybe finite, in some sense?) distributive categories. For more on "schizophrenic objects", Peter Johnstone's review of Clark and Davies' "Natural dualities for the working algebraist" makes good reading: http://north.ecc.edu/alsani/ct99-00(8-12)/msg00116.html