* Groups vs. groupoids (Pat Donaly)
@ 2003-07-14 18:47 Jpdonaly
2003-07-16 17:22 ` Andree Ehresmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jpdonaly @ 2003-07-14 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
To all category theorists:
While (partially) responding to Tom Leinster's 7/04 query regarding limit
preservation, a query of my own occurred to me: On pages 6 and 7 of Alain Connes'
book, "Noncommutative Geometry", he writes, "It is fashionable among
mathematicians to despise groupoids and to consider that only groups have an authentic
mathematical status, probably because of the pejorative suffix oid."
Professor Connes later cites the groupoid of states of the hydrogen atom in order to
eliminate the prejudice against groupoids, but, for group theorists, there is a
more direct way: Since Frobenius and/or Burnside adopted the concept of an
abstract group in order to consider general group actions and representations,
group theorists have been heavily involved in groupoids, whether they liked it
or not.
Is it generally understood by categorists that every group action---as a
comma category---is a groupoid?
Pat Donaly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Groups vs. groupoids (Pat Donaly)
2003-07-14 18:47 Groups vs. groupoids (Pat Donaly) Jpdonaly
@ 2003-07-16 17:22 ` Andree Ehresmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andree Ehresmann @ 2003-07-16 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
In answer to Pat Donaly
The connection between group actions and groupoids has been known and
extensively used for a long time. It was realized by Charles Ehresmann in
the early fifties. In fact Charles came to categories from groupoids, and
to groupoids from group actions and from pseudogroups of transformations.
In particular, in his works on fibre bundles and Differential Geometry, he
associated a groupoid to a pseudogroup of transformations (1), then
considered action of groupoids of jets as extending group actions (2).
In the paper (3) he introduces topological and differentiable categories
(i.e., internal to Top and to Diff), in view of associating to a principal
bundle H a particular topological groupoid P (called a locally trivial
groupoid). He then finds the locally trivial bundles associated to H as the
spaces on which there is an (internal) action of this groupoid. Given a
topological space F with an action of a sub-group of P, he constructs such
a space with fibre F by an "enlargement" process he had defined in his
important paper (4).
These results and many others can be found in the series of papers
reprinted in "Charles Ehresmann : Oeuvres completes et commentees" (more
specially in Part I), 1980-83..
(1) Les prolongements d'une variété différentiable, Atti IV
Cong. dell'Unione Mate. Italiana, Taormina 1951, reprinted in "Oeuvres",
Part I, pp. 207-215.
(2) Introduction à la théorie des structures infinitésmales et des
pseudo-groupes de Lie, Actes Coll. Intern. Geom. Diff. Strasbourg, CNRS
1953, reprinted in "Oeuvres", Part I, pp. 217-230.
(3) Categories topologiques et categories differentiables, Coll. Geom.
Diff. Globale, CBRM Bruxelles 1959, reprinted in "Oeuvres", Part I, pp.
237-250.
(4) Gattungen von lokalen Strukturen, Jahres. d. Deutsches Math. 60-2,
1957, reprinted in "Oeuvres", Part II, pp. 125-153.
Andree C. Ehresmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-16 17:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-14 18:47 Groups vs. groupoids (Pat Donaly) Jpdonaly
2003-07-16 17:22 ` Andree Ehresmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).