From: Steve Stevenson <steve@cs.clemson.edu>
To: Categories List <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Question on standard terminology
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:31:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6B79B655-F801-11D7-A52E-000A959EB774@cs.clemson.edu> (raw)
Good Morning:
I have a question about "standard terminology" or "standard
methodology". Is there a standard technique to generate the closure of
a set through generating the next element from the current? The
motivating idea is a simple one: generate a free language from the list
of characters. This is a standard inductive process seen in lots of
automata and formal language books. Seems like there is product
followed by a co-product sort of action.
best regards,
steve
--------
D. E. Stevenson, Department of Computer Science
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0974
864.656.6880 http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve
reply other threads:[~2003-10-06 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6B79B655-F801-11D7-A52E-000A959EB774@cs.clemson.edu \
--to=steve@cs.clemson.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).