categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Roberts <droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au>
To: Categories List <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Equivalence relations
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:01:03 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77132699-0BA8-4186-894D-A1114F3C597B@maths.adelaide.edu.au> (raw)

Dear all,

Considering the well known fact that an equivalence relation R on a
set S gives a groupoid S_R with object set S, and the quotient of S
by R is pi_0(S_R), has anyone done any work on "equivalence
relations" on categories?

Taking the skeleton of a cat is the prototypical example, but what I
had in mind was a more "relative" construction. Given a groupoid
enriched in categories, taking a sort of Pi_1 would give us a
groupoid mod "equivalent morphisms".
There is a smell of relative homotopy about, and I don't know enough
in that area.

I realise there are a couple of levels to this game, as evidenced by
Kapranov and Voevodsky in their paper on 2-cats and the Zamolodchikov
tetrahedron equations - do we take a "skeleton" at one or more
dimensions?

Any pointers appreciated


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
David Roberts
School of Mathematical Sciences
University of Adelaide SA 5005
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au
www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/~droberts
www.trf.org.au

"Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature."
- Mark 16:15

CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
-----------------------------------------------------------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
and contains information that may be confidential and/or
copyright.  If you are not the intended recipient please
notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete
this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email
by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
prohibited. No representation is made that this email or
any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.







             reply	other threads:[~2005-11-23  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-23  6:31 David Roberts [this message]
2005-11-25 13:41 Kirill Mackenzie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77132699-0BA8-4186-894D-A1114F3C597B@maths.adelaide.edu.au \
    --to=droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).