From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2273 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vaughan Pratt Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Query (Q-algebras) Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 12:05:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018541 3348 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:22:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:22:21 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Thu May 8 16:53:33 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:53:33 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19DrRz-00074B-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Thu, 08 May 2003 16:53:07 -0300 In-Reply-To: Message from Vaughan Pratt of "Wed, 07 May 2003 11:55:08 PDT." <200305071855.LAA22674@coraki.Stanford.EDU> Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 8 Original-Lines: 30 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2273 Archived-At: >(So if Z is 3 then there are 27 = 3^3 "Boolean" operations in place of >the familiar 4 = 2^2.) There should have been a "unary" in there of course. Another question about these Q-algebras that Oswald Wyler was asking about: what is a necessary and sufficient condition for a complete basis for finitary Q-algebras (the theory of Boolean algebras rather than CABAs) having any given Z? For Z = 2 one answer (at least for the version of the problem which only considers nonzeroary operations) is that for each of the following properties the basis must contain a counterexample to that property. Necessity follows because each property is preserved under composition; sufficiency takes more work. * selfdual (e.g. xy+yz+zx = (x+y)(y+z)(z+x)) * monotone * affine (expressible as the XOR of its arguments, optionally plus 1) * strict (maps the all-zeros input to zero) * costrict (maps the all-ones input to one) (NAND violates all five at once.) Is there a fixed number of such properties that works for all finite cardinalities of Z, or must the number of properties of this kind grow with Z? Vaughan Pratt