From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2275 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ernie Manes" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Query (Q-algebras) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 07:24:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018543 3353 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:22:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:22:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Fri May 9 12:49:35 2003 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Fri, 09 May 2003 12:49:35 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 19EA3l-000530-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Fri, 09 May 2003 12:45:21 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 10 Original-Lines: 59 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2275 Archived-At: Hi Vaughan, Regarding these and similar questions, I suggest looking at the following two gems: A. L. Foster, Gerneralized "Boolean" theory of universal algebras, Part II. Identities and subdirect sums of functionally complete algebras, Math. Zeit. 59, 1953, 191-199. T.-K. Hu, Stone duality for primal algebra theory, Math. Zeit. 110, 1060, 180-198. Ernie Manes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vaughan Pratt" To: Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 3:05 PM Subject: categories: Re: Query (Q-algebras) > > > >(So if Z is 3 then there are 27 = 3^3 "Boolean" operations in place of > >the familiar 4 = 2^2.) > > There should have been a "unary" in there of course. > > Another question about these Q-algebras that Oswald Wyler was asking > about: what is a necessary and sufficient condition for a complete basis > for finitary Q-algebras (the theory of Boolean algebras rather than CABAs) > having any given Z? For Z = 2 one answer (at least for the version of the > problem which only considers nonzeroary operations) is that for each of the > following properties the basis must contain a counterexample to that property. > Necessity follows because each property is preserved under composition; > sufficiency takes more work. > > * selfdual (e.g. xy+yz+zx = (x+y)(y+z)(z+x)) > * monotone > * affine (expressible as the XOR of its arguments, optionally plus 1) > * strict (maps the all-zeros input to zero) > * costrict (maps the all-ones input to one) > > (NAND violates all five at once.) Is there a fixed number of such properties > that works for all finite cardinalities of Z, or must the number of properties > of this kind grow with Z? > > Vaughan Pratt > >