categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaughan Pratt <pratt@cs.stanford.edu>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: cracks and pots
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:52:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1FKRf8-00036i-Ep@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Category theory, and for that matter modern (as opposed to elementary)
algebra, is to mathematics as mathematics is to physics, and for that
matter to computer science.  Whereas mathematics organizes reasoning
about the phenomena studied by physicists and computer scientists,
algebra and category theory perform a similar function for mathematics.

In any setting organization is desirable, and arguably necessary on
occasion.  But the use of algebra and category theory to organize
physics and computer science is a double whammy here.  One should
therefore be doubly sympathetic of those physicists and computer
scientists who want to know what substantive contribution is being made
to their subject and can't evaluate the answers because they are one if
not two levels removed from the necessary abstractions.

Vaughan Pratt




             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-17  1:52 Vaughan Pratt [this message]
2006-03-18 15:21 ` James Stasheff
2006-03-18 20:22 ` Mamuka Jibladze
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-29 19:23 dusko
2006-03-29 14:02 David Yetter
2006-03-28  8:01 dusko
2006-03-29 12:57 ` Alex Simpson
2006-03-26 13:37 V. Schmitt
2006-03-25  3:22 David Yetter
2006-03-24 16:24 Marta Bunge
2006-03-23 19:45 Peter Arndt
2006-03-23 16:50 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-26 13:25 ` Urs Schreiber
2006-03-19 18:25 Steve Vickers
2006-03-18 15:19 James Stasheff
2006-03-17 18:29 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-17 17:26 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-17 16:24 Krzysztof Worytkiewicz
2006-03-17 14:25 jim stasheff
2006-03-17  9:36 George Janelidze
2006-03-17  8:49 Marta Bunge
2006-03-17  8:06 Marta Bunge
2006-03-16 20:47 John Baez
2006-03-16 18:41 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-16 17:29 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-16 14:54 Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-16 12:05 dusko
2006-03-16  9:51 V. Schmitt
2006-03-15 21:00 Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-15 13:35 RFC Walters
2006-03-14 19:56 John Baez
2006-03-15 12:23 ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-15 17:26 ` Krzysztof Worytkiewicz
     [not found] <BAY114-F26C035E683A780D5555217DFE10@phx.gbl>
2006-03-14 17:08 ` Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-14 17:48   ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-27 14:28     ` Peter Selinger
2006-03-12 22:29 Marta Bunge
2006-03-14  6:08 ` David Yetter
2006-03-14 23:18   ` Robert Seely
2006-03-14 14:55 ` Eduardo Dubuc
2006-03-14 16:05 ` Robert J. MacG. Dawson
2006-03-14 16:30   ` Marta Bunge
2006-03-14 23:26     ` Dominic Hughes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1FKRf8-00036i-Ep@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=pratt@cs.stanford.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).