From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/3479 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Nichols-Barrer Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Characterization of integers as a commutative ring with unit Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:09:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019331 8947 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:35:31 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Fri Oct 27 09:39:37 2006 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:39:37 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GdQuV-0004km-PS for categories-list@mta.ca; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:34:07 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 42 Original-Lines: 42 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:3479 Archived-At: Hi Andrej, Isn't Z the initial /ring/? 0 isn't initial, as 0=1 holds only in itself (Spec Z is the terminal scheme, Spec 0 the empty scheme, so the initial scheme). -Josh On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Andrej Bauer wrote: > For the purposes of defining the data structure of integers in a > Coq-like system, I am looking for an _algebraic_ characterization of > integers Z as a commutative ring with unit. (The one-element ring is a > ring.) > > Some possible characterizations which I don't much like: > > 1) Z is the free group generated by one generator. I want the ring > structure, not the group structure. > > 2) Z is the free ring generated by the semiring of natural numbers. This > just translates the problem to characterization of the semiring of > natural numbers. > > 3) Z is the initial non-trivial ring. This is no good because > "non-trivial" is an inequality "0 =/= 1" rather than an equality. > > 4) Let R be the free commutative ring with unit generated by X. Then Z > is the image of the homomorphism R --> R which maps X to 0. This is just > ugly and there must be something better. > > I feel like I am missing something obvious. Surely Z appears as a > prominent member of the category of commutative rings with unit, does it > not? > > Best regards, > > Andrej > >