From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/3668 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robin Cockett Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: bigger dagger problems Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:06:35 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019445 9706 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:37:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Wed Mar 7 13:54:30 2007 -0400 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1HP0GG-0001Na-Tk for categories-list@mta.ca; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:49:12 -0400 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 22 Original-Lines: 17 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:3668 Archived-At: Ah ... and do the larger dagger problems of a linear dagger bicategory=20 give a sword bicategory? These little daggers are no match for this one! -robin Juergen Koslowski wrote: > In fact, this should work in a (linear) > bicategory or even a poly-bicategory ... > > > -- J=FCrgen > > =20