categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaughan Pratt <pratt@cs.stanford.edu>
To: categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Early CT problems that are still open
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:22:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HPoz5-0000qF-PC@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

What early problems in category theory remain open today?  Who first
posed them, and when and where?

Context: In December the Journal of the AMS rejected the solution of the
half-century-old lattice theory problem of whether the congruence
lattices of lattices are exactly the distributive algebraic lattices.
Since these two classes coincide for all algebraic lattices with up to
aleph_1 compact generators [Huhn 1989], one would imagine that surely
the equivalence must extend to all cardinalities.  Fred Wehrung recently
showed it doesn't, refined by Pavel Ruzicka to show that they diverge
exactly at aleph_2.  For two such naturally defined classes it's very
unusual to first diverge at such a high cardinal.  (For elementary
classes it's impossible: if they're still together at aleph_0 they're
the same.)

Now JAMS doesn't ordinarily cater to either lattice theory or category
theory.  Yet its mission statement declares JAMS to be "devoted to ...
all areas of pure and applied mathematics."  The general feeling among
lattice theorists is that, whatever JAMS might think of those areas it
is unaccustomed to serving, rejecting the solution to so celebrated an
open problem is beyond the pale given their mission statement.  There is
no likelihood of their being overwhelmed with such so space can't be a
reason.  More on this at http://clp.stanford.edu .

My interest here in early open CT problems is to get a sense of how
comparable CT's situation is with lattice theory's.  On the one hand it
might seem insane for either category theorists or lattice theorists to
bother the JAMS audience if they're not interested.  On the other, if
it's a really neat result then why hide it under a bushel?  The
mathematical community at large ought to be sufficiently open-minded as
to appreciate such an achievement.  If a category theorist were to
publish the solution to a long-standing CT problem in JAMS, it would
reflect well on CT, and it would lend support to JAMS's mission statement.

Vaughan




                 reply	other threads:[~2007-03-09 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1HPoz5-0000qF-PC@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=pratt@cs.stanford.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).