* functions and polynomials
@ 2007-03-21 11:06 Paul Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul Taylor @ 2007-03-21 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
How widely applicable is the following idea?
Let f: Z x Z -> Z be a binary FUNCTION (in the sense of sets)
on the integers, with the property that
- for each x:Z, f(x,-) : Z -> Z is a (agrees with a unique)
POLYNOMIAL, whose coefficients are functions of x; and similarly
- for each y:Z, f(-,y) : Z -> Z is also a polynomial.
Then f(x,y) was itself a polynomial in two variables.
This generalises to a disjoint union of sets of variables,
ie to functions Z^X x Z^Y -> Z that are polynomials in one
set of variables for each value of the other, and vice versa.
The (possible) categorical generalisation is this:
Let T be a strong monad on a topos, CCC or even a symmetric monoidal
closed category, and K=T0 its free algebra. Then there is a natural
transformation
r_X: T X ---> K^(K^X),
which we suppose to be mono. (How widely is this the case?)
Then the above result states that (in that case) the square
(K^Y)
T (X + Y) >---------> TX
V | V
| | |
| ----- | K^Y
| | r_X
| K^X |
V r_Y V
(K^X) >--------> (K^X x K^Y)
TY K
is a pullback (in fact, an intersection).
I am primarily concerned with the case where T encodes the theory
of frames over either Set or Dcpo, though if the result extends to
commutative rings or other algebraic theories, that would be very
interesting too.
Paul Taylor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-03-21 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-21 11:06 functions and polynomials Paul Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).