From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/3751 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rjwood@mathstat.dal.ca (RJ Wood) Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Beck-Chevalley for presheaves on groupoids? Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:07:22 -0300 (ADT) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019500 10142 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:38:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:38:20 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Fri May 4 21:51:02 2007 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Fri, 04 May 2007 21:51:02 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Hk8Ra-0002bP-03 for categories-list@mta.ca; Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:14 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 11 Original-Lines: 73 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:3751 Archived-At: If G -> H | <= | v v K -> L is a square (with a 2-cell as shown) in cat then applying ^ =((-)^{op},Set) gives G^<- H^ ^ => ^ | | K^<- L^ and taking the mate with respect to the horizontal adjunctions given by left Kan extension gives G^-> H^ ^ => ^ | | K^-> L^ If the original square is a comma square then the 2-cell in the third square is invertible. There are squares other than comma squares, cocomma squares for example, for which the 2-cell in the third square is invertible. See Rene Guitart's early work on exact squares. Best, Rj Wood > One of you must know the answer to this! > > Suppose we have a weak pullback (= pseudo-pullback) square of > groupoids: > > G -> H > | | > v v > K -> L > > Suppose we take presheaves on all four. We can get a square > > hom(G^{op},Set) -> hom(H^{op},Set) > ^ ^ > | | > hom(K^{op},Set) -> hom(L^{op},Set) > > where the arrows pointing forward - in the same direction as > the original arrows - are defined using pushforward, and the arrows > pointing backward are defined using pullback. > > Does this square commute up to natural isomorphism? Do you > know a reference somewhere? > > Some side remarks: > > 1) This seems related to the "Beck-Chevalley condition". > > 2) It may work for categories as well as groupoids, but I happen to > need it only for groupoids. > > 3) I really need it with the category Vect replacing Set, so > if you know a general result for any sufficiently nice category > playing the role of Set here, that would be wonderful. > > Best, > jb