From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4035 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vaughan Pratt Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Warning about Adobe 8 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:26:41 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019680 11421 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:41:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:41:20 +0000 (UTC) To: Categories list Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Mon Oct 29 19:46:58 2007 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:46:58 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1ImdGX-0004bp-5f for categories-list@mta.ca; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:39:25 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 93 Original-Lines: 36 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4035 Archived-At: Have you seen this problem yourself? I've been unable to duplicate it on either Linux or Windows XP, using free Acrobat Reader 8.1.1 dated August 20 on both platforms. I put all five ligatures in a latex file and compiled it directly to pdf with pdflatex, then as a double check indirectly with latex to dvi then to ps with dvips then to pdf with ps2pdf. On XP I did this with the latex that comes with Cygwin, on Linux with the latex that comes with Redhat FC4 (old system I haven't upgraded for a while). Is the problem independent of font? Of dvi-to-pdf converter? Of operating system? Etc, etc. Vaughan Michael Barr wrote: > Whatever you do, do not upgrade to Adobe reader 8. I found this on the > texhax list. > >>> Has anyone else been clobbered by the discovery that Adobe Acrobat 8 >>> tacitly suppresses all ligature glyphs of the fi, fl, ff, ffi, and ffl >>> sort and displays blanks in their place. They do this without warning, >>> so that a file which displays perfectly well in Acrobat 7 is made >>> unreadable in Acrobat 8. >>> > > It turns out that files converted (from the ps file) by the distiller > (which costs something like $500) do not have this problem. I guess Adobe > is tired of free use of their format. At TAC, we still consider the dvi > to be the official format. > > Michael > > >