From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4152 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: selinger@mathstat.dal.ca (Peter Selinger) Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Cartesian closed without products Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:36:39 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019755 11945 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:42:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:42:35 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Wed Jan 9 19:34:05 2008 -0400 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1JCkF5-0001O9-TU for categories-list@mta.ca; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:21:51 -0400 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 13 Original-Lines: 24 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4152 Archived-At: Toby Bartels wrote: > > Richard Garner wrote: > > >On reflection, [...] > >EK-closed requires the unit object to be representable as > >well. > > This is a reasonable requirement anyway, > since the unit is the 0fold iterated hom, > just as it's the 0fold iterated product. > So if you think > should be accompanied by , > then so should . > > OTOH, the version without unit probably has some use, > just as non-monoid semigroups occasionally do. What is the "0fold iterated" of a non-associative operation? -- Peter