From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4482 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Barr Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: abutment Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:08:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019974 13511 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:14 +0000 (UTC) To: Categories list Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Mon Aug 18 09:26:08 2008 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:26:08 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1KV3nB-000646-2S for categories-list@mta.ca; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:25:01 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 17 Original-Lines: 7 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4482 Archived-At: That seems to be the translation of the word, thanks to several. That still leaves that mysterious E^{pq} ---> G^p(E^{p+q}) to correct, since I do not believe that it is correct as stands. Michael