From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4489 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eduardo J. Dubuc" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: abutment Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:54:02 -0300 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019978 13542 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:18 +0000 (UTC) To: Categories list Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Tue Aug 19 13:58:00 2008 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:58:00 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1KVUWU-0005P5-2u for categories-list@mta.ca; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:57:34 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 24 Original-Lines: 39 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4489 Archived-At: Well, I read my email backwards, so after my previous post I came into an email that it is certainly useful to many, including myself and Michael. This email tels me that "abutment" is the standard mathematical english version of the french word in the spectral sequence context as in The URL for this search is http://arxiv.org/find/grp_math/1/abs:+abutment/0/1/0/all/0/1 Michael Barr wrote: > Maybe Eduardo should have read my whole post. > > Michael > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, edubuc wrote: > >> >> I suggest to Michael Barr to send the whole sentence where it is found >> the word "aboutissement", and ask for a translation of the sentence. >> He will get a better english version that just a rendering into english >> of that word. >> >> May be the natural 21 century mathematical english version of the french >> sentence will not even use the word "abutment". >> >> >> Michael Barr wrote: >>> That seems to be the translation of the word, thanks to several. That >>> still leaves that mysterious E^{pq} ---> G^p(E^{p+q}) to correct, >>> since I >>> do not believe that it is correct as stands. >>> >>> Michael >>> >> >> >>