From: John Baez <baez@math.ucr.edu>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: biadjoint biequivalence
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:54:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1KVUY5-0005Z2-7K@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
Dear Categorists -
I know someone who needs to construct a "biadjoint biequivalence"
between bicategories, and is not relishing the task.
If somebody was trying to construct an adjoint equivalence between
categories, and was not relishing the task, I might suggest that they
construct an equivalence, and then use the theorem that any equivalence
can be improved to an adjoint equivalence.
Has someone proved that any biequivalence between bicategories
can be improved to a biadjoint biequivalence?
Best,
jb
reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1KVUY5-0005Z2-7K@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=baez@math.ucr.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).