categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaughan Pratt <pratt@cs.stanford.edu>
To: Categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: abutment = aboutement?
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:18:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1KWVqc-0005s8-TO@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Meanwhile I count eight occurrences of "abut" and "abutment" in the (36
kilobyte!) main Wikipedia article on spectral sequences (there are a
dozen separate much shorter articles on particular spectral sequences,
along with a 15 kB article on derived categories).

On the other hand the algebra and geometry articles of the 1987
Britannica Macropaedia both prefer the term "limit" for what a spectral
sequence converges to, in respectively Peter Hilton's contribution
"Other aspects of homological algebra" to the algebra article, and the
geometry article's section on algebraic topology.

Since Wikipedia seems to be trumping Britannica these days, and no one
here has objected to established usage in mathematics trumping
linguistic suitability, the precise distance of "abutment" from the
optimal English cognate for "aboutissement" would appear to be academic,
an epithet reflecting the outside world's perception that raising moot
points is in our job description.

Vaughan

>> Thanks to Eduardo D and Vaughan P and Michel H for their misgivings,
>> which encouraged me to compose the above, despite the assurances
>> of Jim S that the 'abut*' usage is by now well entrenched.
>>
>> Fred




             reply	other threads:[~2008-08-21 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21 19:18 Vaughan Pratt [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-22 16:46 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2008-08-22 13:30 wlawvere
2008-08-22 13:22 jim stasheff
2008-08-22  4:04 Fred E.J. Linton
2008-08-21 20:23 Robert L Knighten
2008-08-21 14:30 Nimish Shah
2008-08-21 14:07 Tim Porter
2008-08-21  6:15 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2008-08-20 15:33 jim stasheff
2008-08-20 14:45 jim stasheff
2008-08-20 13:13 Michael Barr
2008-08-20  5:12 edubuc
2008-08-19 18:06 Vaughan Pratt
2008-08-19  6:28 mhebert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1KWVqc-0005s8-TO@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=pratt@cs.stanford.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).