categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jim stasheff <jds@math.upenn.edu>
To: Categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: abutment = aboutement?
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:22:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1KWsL4-0001GI-B7@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Thaks, Vaughan

That reraises a question I implied earlier
limit for the E_\infty term is appropriate
but that is the graded of what I dimly recall the SS
abuts to - the ungraded, e.g. H^(E) in the Serre-Leray SS

anyone confirm that?

jim

Pratt wrote:
> Meanwhile I count eight occurrences of "abut" and "abutment" in the (36
> kilobyte!) main Wikipedia article on spectral sequences (there are a
> dozen separate much shorter articles on particular spectral sequences,
> along with a 15 kB article on derived categories).
>
> On the other hand the algebra and geometry articles of the 1987
> Britannica Macropaedia both prefer the term "limit" for what a spectral
> sequence converges to, in respectively Peter Hilton's contribution
> "Other aspects of homological algebra" to the algebra article, and the
> geometry article's section on algebraic topology.
>
> Since Wikipedia seems to be trumping Britannica these days, and no one
> here has objected to established usage in mathematics trumping
> linguistic suitability, the precise distance of "abutment" from the
> optimal English cognate for "aboutissement" would appear to be academic,
> an epithet reflecting the outside world's perception that raising moot
> points is in our job description.
>
> Vaughan
>
>>> Thanks to Eduardo D and Vaughan P and Michel H for their misgivings,
>>> which encouraged me to compose the above, despite the assurances
>>> of Jim S that the 'abut*' usage is by now well entrenched.
>>>
>>> Fred
>
>





             reply	other threads:[~2008-08-22 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-22 13:22 jim stasheff [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-22 16:46 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2008-08-22 13:30 wlawvere
2008-08-22  4:04 Fred E.J. Linton
2008-08-21 20:23 Robert L Knighten
2008-08-21 19:18 Vaughan Pratt
2008-08-21 14:30 Nimish Shah
2008-08-21 14:07 Tim Porter
2008-08-21  6:15 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2008-08-20 15:33 jim stasheff
2008-08-20 14:45 jim stasheff
2008-08-20 13:13 Michael Barr
2008-08-20  5:12 edubuc
2008-08-19 18:06 Vaughan Pratt
2008-08-19  6:28 mhebert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1KWsL4-0001GI-B7@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=jds@math.upenn.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).