From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4517 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: peasthope@shaw.ca Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: uniqueness of a map object Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:19:29 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019995 13666 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:46:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:35 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Sat Aug 23 09:44:31 2008 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:44:31 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1KWsTL-0001fT-WB for categories-list@mta.ca; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:44:04 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 52 Original-Lines: 20 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4517 Archived-At: L&S page 314 Ex. 1, "... uniqueness proposition to the=20 effect that if M1, e1 and M2, e2 both serve as map objects=20 with evaluation map for T -> Y, then there is a unique=20 isomorphism between them which is compatible with the=20 evaluation structures."=20 Would this diagram be aiming in the right direction? http://carnot.yi.org/MapObjectUniqueness.jpg Thanks ... Peter E. --=20 http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/ http://carnot.yi.org/ =3D http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/