From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4518 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Barr Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Final post Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241019996 13669 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:46:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:36 +0000 (UTC) To: Categories list Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Sat Aug 23 16:27:48 2008 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:27:48 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1KWyki-0003kD-9p for categories-list@mta.ca; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:26:24 -0300 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 53 Original-Lines: 12 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4518 Archived-At: Karl Hofmann assures me that the domain of \beta^{p,q} is indeed E^{p,q}_\infty, which is the important point. As for the word used, it is unimportant since that approach to spectral sequences seems to have gone by the boards. Thanks to Mike Mislove for posing this question to Karl. And now maybe the moderator can shut down this thread. Michael