From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/4523 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toby Bartels Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Asking for more trouble Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:08:38 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241020003 13682 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:46:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Categories list Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Mon Aug 25 13:25:19 2008 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:25:19 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1KXerT-0002Tf-6w for categories-list@mta.ca; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:24:11 -0300 Content-Disposition: inline Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 58 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:4523 Archived-At: Michael Barr wrote in part: >G is now talking about locally compact spaces and there are two phrases I >have not seen. One is "relatively compact". I assume this is the same as >what I call "conditionally compact", i.e. having compact closure. Depending on the author, "relatively compact" can mean either having compact closure, or having *any* compact superset. In a Hausdorff space, these are equivalent. --Toby