categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gcuri@math.unipd.it
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: Dedekind versus Cauchy reals
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:05:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1LY29C-00012A-2C@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Quoting Paul Taylor <pt09@PaulTaylor.EU>:

>
>
> Toby has also said a lot of interesting things about many different
> systems.  These illustrate my point that it is essential to state
> which system, or which notion of "constructivity" you intend.
>
> He has said, for example
> * The Dedekind reals can also be constructed in CZF (Peter Aczel's
>    predicative constructive set theory) even if you remove countable
>    choice, using subset collection aka fullness.
> * Similarly, if you remove identity types from intensional type theory
>    (so breaking the justification of countable choice), you can still
>    justify the fullness axiom and so construct the Dedekind reals
>    (albeit not literally as sets of rational numbers).
> * The Cauchy reals exist an a Pi-W-pretopos (equivalently, in a
>    constructive set or type theory with exponentiation but no power
>    sets or even fullness and with infinity but no countable choice).
> * But the Dedekind reals, as far as [he] can tell, do not; excluded
>    middle, power sets, fullness, or countable choice would each do the
>    job, but you need ~something~.
>
> I would challenge someone to consider the last of these questions
> seriously, maybe taking a hint from the second.   ASD provides another,
> as it uses lambda term over a special object instead of talking about
> "sets" of rational numbers.

A note concerning the possibility of constructing the Dedekind reals without
fullness, etc:
the Dedekind reals can be defined in constructive set theory  even without
excluded middle, power sets, fullness, or countable choice. The point is that
they then form a class and not a set.
Class-sized objects are however the norm in a constructive predicative setting.
For instance, a (non-trivial) locale is carried by a class that is never a set;
in general a formal space or formal topology is a large object too, so that one
often deals with superlarge "categories" with large homsets.


Giovanni Curi



Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata
Universita' degli Studi di Padova
www.math.unipd.it




             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-13 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-13 15:05 gcuri [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-23  9:03 Michael Fourman
2009-02-22 14:09 Paul Taylor
2009-02-16 22:09 Paul Taylor
2009-02-16  7:01 Andrej Bauer
2009-02-15  7:43 Ronnie Brown
2009-02-15  6:50 Vaughan Pratt
2009-02-13 12:28 Thomas Streicher
2009-02-13  4:39 Toby Bartels
2009-02-13  0:07 Andrej Bauer
2009-02-12 12:54 Paul Taylor
2009-02-09 11:49 Thomas Streicher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1LY29C-00012A-2C@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=gcuri@math.unipd.it \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).