categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre.Rodin@ens.fr
To: Charles Wells <charles@abstractmath.org>, catbb <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: sketch theory
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:44:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1M8FF2-0004kZ-Dr@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

many thanks, Charles, somehow I forgot that the Elephant is also about Sketches.
I came across this recent paper by Diskin&Wolter

http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~zdiskin/Pubs/ACCAT-07.pdf

where the authors propose a version of sketch-based syntax for Computer Science
purposes. The main idea here (as far as I understood the paper) is to use
sketches as arities of predicates. I heard about similar ideas from Rene
Guitart in private conversations (but Rene's approach is algebraic rather than
logical). Looking at GBLS briefly I couldn't immediately grasp if your and
Atish Bagchi's approach to graph-based logic is based on similar ideas or your
approach is quite different. I certainly should read GBLS more carefully for
discussing it but I would grateful for a hint.

Andrei



Selon Charles Wells <charles@abstractmath.org>:

> I have not kept up with the field very well, but I can recommend these
> works:
>
> Peter Johnstone, *Sketches of an Elephant*, Vol. 2, OUP 2003: the chapter on
> sketches.  (I am in rural Wisconsin at the moment asnd don't have access to
> the book.  If OUP would make its pages available to look at on Amazon I
> could have told you the exact page.)
>
> Bagchi and Wells, *Graph Based Logic and Sketches*, here:
>
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0809/0809.3023v1.pdf
>
> Also Kinoshita, et al 1997, referred to in GBLS.  There might be relevant
> papers since 1993 mentioned in the Elephant, too.
>
> Category people:  If you can suggest other papers that should be included,
> let me know soon, and I will revise the sketches paper to include them (and
> the ones I mentioned above).
>
> Charles Wells
>
>



             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-23  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-23  0:44 Andre.Rodin [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-25 22:09 Steve Lack
2009-05-25  5:03 John Baez
2009-05-25  0:18 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-24 23:21 Steve Lack
2009-05-23  2:30 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-22 14:58 Charles Wells
2009-05-22 14:38 Steve Vickers
2009-05-22 14:29 Charles Wells
2009-05-21 19:43 John Baez
2009-05-20 21:23 Andre.Rodin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1M8FF2-0004kZ-Dr@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=andre.rodin@ens.fr \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=charles@abstractmath.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).