categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mjhealy@ece.unm.edu
To: "Michael Barr" <barr@math.mcgill.ca>, categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: patenting colimits?
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:18:27 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1M9WGz-0000tB-QS@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Dear Michael and all,

I am unaware of a great deal of the history of category theory in grant
funding.  The NSF declaration is troubling, especially since my colleagues
and I so far have had our category-theoretic proposals in cognitive
neuroscience rejected.  Some of the reviewers, though, did seem to find
favor with our use of category theory in relation to their subject; the
problem seems to have been more in other areas.  We haven't given up!

I regret not joining the FMCS crowd at UBC.  Too much work has resulted
from a prior commitment.

Best regards,
Mike

> Interesting comments by Vaughan.  I have not looked at this patent and
> have no intention of doing so.  But Charles and I, both in CTCS and in a
> paper published in some CS conference proceedings exhibited things like
> a sketch for trees of integers as a pushout or amalgamated sum of a sketch
> for trees and that for integers by identifying the sort for integers in
> the latter with the sort for leaves in the fomer.  I think we have a
> triple amalgamation too, something like trees of lists of integers.  So
> evidence of prior art certainly exists, if anyone cares.
>
> On the other hand, I for one would welcome serious applications of
> category theory in industry.  My former department is hiring in only three
> areas: number theory (in which they are truly strong), applied math, and
> statistics (in each of which I rather suspect they are truly weak since
> they are competing with every g-d university in North America).  I would
> just love to shove it in their collective faces that by allowing the
> category theory group to wither, they have allowed an important applied
> area to disappear.  But no, they would rather be in the rearguard than the
> advanced guard.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to make the same point to NSF which announced
> officially in 1993 that there would never again be any funding in category
> theory?
>
> Michael
>
>
> [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
>




[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-27 16:18 mjhealy [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-02 10:38 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-06-02  8:51 Till Mossakowski
2009-05-30 12:07 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-29 19:57 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-29  1:24 Toby Bartels
2009-05-28 21:07 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-28 15:49 Uwe.Wolter
2009-05-28  7:15 David Espinosa
2009-05-27 19:33 Toby Bartels
2009-05-27 19:22 Toby Bartels
2009-05-27 16:12 David CHEMOUIL
2009-05-27 16:08 Steve Vickers
2009-05-27 11:29 zoran skoda
2009-05-27  7:28 David CHEMOUIL
2009-05-27  6:21 soloviev
2009-05-27  3:29 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-27  2:53 David Spivak
2009-05-26  4:46 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-26  1:20 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2009-05-26  0:04 Toby Bartels
2009-05-26  0:04 Greg Meredith
2009-05-25 23:53 Michael Barr
2009-05-25 21:11 Toby Bartels
2009-05-25 18:53 Vaughan Pratt
2009-05-25 13:35 Ronnie Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1M9WGz-0000tB-QS@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=mjhealy@ece.unm.edu \
    --cc=barr@math.mcgill.ca \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).