categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Espinosa" <david@davidespinosa.net>
To: "Categories" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: patenting colimits?
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:15:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1M9qLg-000313-EN@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)


We seem to be more excited about patents than categories!  I guess opinions
are cheaper than theorems...

I'd say that citation is the academic form of currency.  Here's a
dictionary:

Academia: Academics rush to publish before their colleagues.
Industry: Companies rush to patent before their competition.

Academia: Academics get quite upset if you use their ideas without citing
them.
Industry: Companies sue you if you use their patents without paying them.

Academia: A generous academic lets you publish his idea (yeah, right).
Industry: A generous businessman lets you profit from his idea (yeah,
right).

Academia: You can publish improvements to someone's basic idea.
Industry: You can patent improvements to someone's basic idea.

So you can see why I find the academic "high horse" attitude towards patents
a bit hypocritical.

BTW, here's a difference between academia and industry, which comes about
because money is more flexible than time:

Academia: An academic *cannot* give you any credit for his existing
publication.
Industry: A company *can* let you profit from its existing patent.

David




[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-28  7:15 David Espinosa [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-02 10:38 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-06-02  8:51 Till Mossakowski
2009-05-30 12:07 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-29 19:57 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-29  1:24 Toby Bartels
2009-05-28 21:07 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-28 15:49 Uwe.Wolter
2009-05-27 19:33 Toby Bartels
2009-05-27 19:22 Toby Bartels
2009-05-27 16:18 mjhealy
2009-05-27 16:12 David CHEMOUIL
2009-05-27 16:08 Steve Vickers
2009-05-27 11:29 zoran skoda
2009-05-27  7:28 David CHEMOUIL
2009-05-27  6:21 soloviev
2009-05-27  3:29 Zinovy Diskin
2009-05-27  2:53 David Spivak
2009-05-26  4:46 Dusko Pavlovic
2009-05-26  1:20 Eduardo J. Dubuc
2009-05-26  0:04 Toby Bartels
2009-05-26  0:04 Greg Meredith
2009-05-25 23:53 Michael Barr
2009-05-25 21:11 Toby Bartels
2009-05-25 18:53 Vaughan Pratt
2009-05-25 13:35 Ronnie Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1M9qLg-000313-EN@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=david@davidespinosa.net \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).