From: tholen@mathstat.yorku.ca
To: Michael Shulman <shulman@uchicago.edu>, categories@mta.ca,
Subject: Re: Famous unsolved problems in ordinary category theory
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:53:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MCcqB-0007Xq-T1@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
Finding the "right" questions and notions is certainly a prominent
theme in category theory, perhaps more prominently than in other
fields. Still, just like in other fields, solving open problems was
always part of the agenda. For example, half a century ago people asked
whether every "standard construction" (=monad) is induced by an
adjunction, and it took a few years to have two interesting answers.
And there is ceratinly a string of examples leading all the way to
today.
I don't know whether there are any >famous< unsolved problems in
ordinary category theory, but there are certainly non-trivial
questions. Here is one that we formulated in an article with Reinhard
B"orger (Can. J. Math 42 (1990) 213-229) two decades ago:
A category A is total (Street-Walters) if its Yoneda embedding A --->
Set^{A^{op}} has a left adjoint. Then
1. A has small colimits, and
2. any functor A-->B that preserves all existing colimits of A has a
right adjoint.
Do properties 1 and 2 imply totality for A?
I must admit that, after formulating the question we never considered
it again, so there may well be a known or quick answer. So don't hold
back please, especially since I plan to incorporate several questions
of this type in my CT09 talk.
Walter.
Quoting Michael Shulman <shulman@uchicago.edu>:
> Probably people are going to jump on me for saying this, but it seems to
> me that category theory is different from much of mathematics in that
> often the difficulty is in the definitions rather than the theorems, and
> in the questions rather than the answers. Thus, there are probably many
> unsolved problems in category theory, but we don't know what they are
> yet, because figuring out what they are is the main aspect of them
> that is unsolved. (-:
>
> Mike
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 1:53 tholen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-11 11:30 Jaap van Oosten
2009-06-09 15:47 Steve Vickers
2009-06-09 13:35 Reinhard Boerger
2009-06-06 9:18 soloviev
2009-06-06 3:59 Bhupinder Singh Anand
2009-06-06 1:35 Hasse Riemann
2009-06-05 22:36 Robin Cockett
2009-06-05 14:17 Thomas Streicher
2009-06-05 11:07 Ronnie Brown
2009-06-05 8:41 Paul Taylor
2009-06-05 4:10 John Baez
2009-06-05 2:54 John Iskra
2009-06-05 2:42 Hasse Riemann
2009-06-03 20:30 Ronnie Brown
2009-06-03 16:45 Michael Shulman
2009-06-02 16:31 Hasse Riemann
2009-05-23 20:14 Hasse Riemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1MCcqB-0007Xq-T1@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=tholen@mathstat.yorku.ca \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=shulman@uchicago.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).