From: Hasse Riemann <rafaelb77@hotmail.com>
To: Category mailing list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Famous unsolved problems in ordinary category theory
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:42:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MCcql-0007an-Kt@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
Dear Ronnie
This is what stuck with me from the e-mail
> One aim of mathematics is understanding, making difficult things easy,
> seeing why something is true. Thus improved exposition is an important part
> of the progress of mathematics (even if this is ignored by Research
> Assessment Exercises).
Indeed they don't teach you this at the university, but somehow i always knew it.
It was obvious from the start, then i had to resist everyone trying to tell me otherwise.
I am glad that there are other who see this as well.
> Grothendieck wrote to me in 1982: `The introduction of the cipher 0 or the
> group concept was general nonsense too, and mathematics was more or less
> stagnating for thousands of years because nobody was around to take such
> childish steps ...'.
I like this quote since i like structuralizing mathematics.
Something to think about if you want to take the next step.
Fill in the void with a precise mathematical void.
Best regards
Rafael Borowiecki
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 2:42 Hasse Riemann [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-11 11:30 Jaap van Oosten
2009-06-09 15:47 Steve Vickers
2009-06-09 13:35 Reinhard Boerger
2009-06-06 9:18 soloviev
2009-06-06 3:59 Bhupinder Singh Anand
2009-06-06 1:35 Hasse Riemann
2009-06-05 22:36 Robin Cockett
2009-06-05 14:17 Thomas Streicher
2009-06-05 11:07 Ronnie Brown
2009-06-05 8:41 Paul Taylor
2009-06-05 4:10 John Baez
2009-06-05 2:54 John Iskra
2009-06-05 1:53 tholen
2009-06-03 20:30 Ronnie Brown
2009-06-03 16:45 Michael Shulman
2009-06-02 16:31 Hasse Riemann
2009-05-23 20:14 Hasse Riemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1MCcql-0007an-Kt@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=rafaelb77@hotmail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).