categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Grandis <grandis@dima.unige.it>
To: George Janelidze <janelg@telkomsa.net>, categories@mta.ca,
Subject: Re: 'Directed Algebraic Topology'
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:42:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MsgZS-0007Co-Tj@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Dear George,

There is indeed such a connection between asymmetric distances
and directed algebraic topology, but is not entirely trivial. The
obvious solution,
by 'left' and 'right topologies' would not work well. The good
solution, in my
opinion, is constructing a 'symmetric topology' and adding
distinguished paths.

All this is in my book, and also in a paper:
M. Grandis,
The fundamental weighted category of a weighted space: From directed
to weighted algebraic topology,
Homology Homotopy Appl. 9 (2007), 221-256.

I am presently working with a colleague. Later, I will be able to
comment more precisely on
these points.

All the best

Marco


On 28 Sep 2009, at 20:43, George Janelidze wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> In addition to my message of September 22 addressed to Michael Barr
> and all
> of you (concerning 'Directed Algebraic Topology'/quasi-uniform
> spaces) I am
> forwarding a message from Guillaume Brummer:
>
> "...Thank you for copying this interesting material to me, and for
> mentioning quasi-uniform spaces to Michael Barr. Serious early work
> in this
> field was by Leopoldo Nachbin of Rio de Janeiro, published in CRASP
> 226
> (1948) 774-775, -- just 11 years after Andre' Weil's monograph on
> uniform
> spaces. Then came Nachbin's monograph Topologia e ordem (Chicago
> 1950), of
> which an English translation Topology and order was published by Van
> Nostrand (1964). Meantime the book by A'. Csa'sza'r, Fondements de la
> topologie ge'ne'rale, had appeared in Paris (1960)..."
>
> Guillaume Brummer also says:
>
> "...Hans-Peter K"unzi has published several surveys of this field
> since
> 1993, with lots of bibliography..."
>
> However, I still see no connection (which does not mean that it
> will never
> occur!) between "directed/asymmetric algebraic topology" and
> "asymmetric
> general topology". Surely Marco Grandis is the right person to ask
> about
> this. Well, since Marco mentioned preordered topological spaces,
> one could
> think of bitopological spaces and then quasi-uniform spaces might
> occur
> naturally...
>
> George Janelidze
>
>



[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-29 11:42 Marco Grandis [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-28 18:43 George Janelidze
2009-09-22 21:01 Martin Escardo
2009-09-22 13:12 Gaucher Philippe
2009-09-22 13:05 Peter Bubenik
2009-09-22  9:00 Urs Schreiber
2009-09-22  8:37 Marco Grandis
2009-09-21 23:15 George Janelidze
2009-09-21 15:56 Michael Barr
2009-09-21  9:44 Urs Schreiber
2009-09-18 15:23 Marco Grandis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1MsgZS-0007Co-Tj@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=grandis@dima.unige.it \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=janelg@telkomsa.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).