From: Toby Bartels <toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu>
To: Al Vilcius <al.r@vilcius.com>, categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: forms
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NVbzv-0007Zl-8Z@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NVPwa-00027f-UU@mailserv.mta.ca>
Al Vilcius wrote:
>to which category do multilinear maps belong?
>X tensor Y ---> Z linear in k-mod
>X cartesian Y ---> Z bilinear
>X ---> Y hom Z linear in k-mod
>where do the middle arrows live?
The slickest answer is perhaps that the middle arrows live
in the *multicategory* k-mod:
X, Y ---> Z bilinear in k-mod
The problem with this is that multicategories
are little bit more complicated than categories.
http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/multicategory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicategory
Because k-mod is a monoidal category (aka tensor category),
that is it has a well-behaved operation tensor,
we can use mere linear maps X tensor Y ---> Z instead.
http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/monoidal+category
http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/monoidal-categories/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoidal_category
And because k-mod is a closed category,
that is it has a well-behaved operation hom,
we can use mere linear maps X ---> Y hom Z instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_category
Since these two operations tensor and hom are compatible,
in that they correspond to the same multicategory structure,
k-mod is in fact a *closed monoidal category*.
http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/closed+monoidal+category
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_monoidal_category
Category theorists usually turn a bilinear map into a linear map
in one or the other of these ways, to avoid multicategories.
>From a structural perpsective, all three perspectives are equivalent,
so it really doesn't matter which way you look at them.
But multicategories are there if you want them.
--Toby
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-14 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-13 17:18 forms Al Vilcius
2010-01-14 15:19 ` forms Andrej Bauer
2010-01-14 17:15 ` Toby Bartels [this message]
2010-01-15 2:51 forms John Baez
2010-01-19 19:27 forms Al Vilcius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1NVbzv-0007Zl-8Z@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu \
--cc=al.r@vilcius.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).